Morgan Cohen Bach
  • Services
    • Unpaid Heavy Duty Recovery
    • Out-of-Business Collection
    • Debt Recovery
    • Litigation >
      • Legal Proceedings
    • Mediation
    • Investigation
    • International
  • Submit Claim
    • Unpaid Tow Invoice Submission
    • Nonconsensual Tow Bill
    • Debt Recovery - Submission
  • Blog
  • Client Portal
  • ​(877) 459-2230

MCB Blog

News & Publications

Contact Us

Connecticut Supreme Court: Towing and recovery services can be regulated

7/15/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
The Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled the state can regulate the fees that towing companies charge for nonconsensual towing and recovery services. 

The state court’s decision stemmed from a dispute between Modzelewski’s Towing and Recovery and Connecticut’s Department of Motor Vehicles. Modzelewski’s had been ordered to reimburse $12,787 in overcharges from a tow and recovery in September 2011. The tow operator argued that the state could regulate the prices for the actual tow but not for the recovery or storage fees. 

Modzelewski’s Towing and Recovery appealed the reimbursement order. The appeals court ruled that the Department of Motor Vehicles couldn’t regulate the pre-tow and post-tow services. If the Connecticut Supreme Court had agreed, towing companies would have been able to charge any price they wanted for services that came before and after a nonconsensual tow. Instead, the state supreme court upheld the $12,787 refund. 

“This is a pretty significant ruling,” said Mike Matousek, the director of state legislative affairs for the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association. “This is bigger than one company.”

Connecticut’s high court said the reason nonconsensual tows are regulated is to prevent consumers from being charged too much. 

“Separating two closely related parts of the towing process by allowing state regulation to prevent exorbitant fees for the actual towing but not for the recovery services that enable the towing to take place simply makes no sense, given the inextricable relationship between recovery services and the actual towing,” the court wrote. “We therefore conclude that state laws regulating the fees charged for recovery services performed in connection with a nonconsensual towing are not pre-empted by federal law.”
 
By Mark Schremmer, Land Line staff writer
Copyright © OOIDA

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Business
    Careers
    Debt Recovery
    International News
    Investigations
    Litigation
    Nonconsensual Tow
    Salvage
    Survey

    Archives

    October 2021
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015

Picture
Terms &  Conditions
​Privacy  Policy
Company News & Publications
Careers 
​Contact Us
 ​(877) 459-2230
Copyright ©  2015 - 2019 Morgan, Cohen & Bach, LLC. All Rights Reserved.  
  • Services
    • Unpaid Heavy Duty Recovery
    • Out-of-Business Collection
    • Debt Recovery
    • Litigation >
      • Legal Proceedings
    • Mediation
    • Investigation
    • International
  • Submit Claim
    • Unpaid Tow Invoice Submission
    • Nonconsensual Tow Bill
    • Debt Recovery - Submission
  • Blog
  • Client Portal
  • ​(877) 459-2230